We rely on the Damascene process and CMP because it solves step formation problems much more effectively than spin-on glass. The Damascene process involves etching trenches, filling them with metal, and then polishing away excess material, which provides a uniformly flat surface. Spin-on glass can only mitigate local roughness and doesn't offer the comprehensive planarization that CMP provides. It's crucial for producing high-quality, reliable semiconductor devices.
You should choose the Damascene process with CMP if you need to fully address step formation across the entire wafer. I find that spin-on glass is useful but limited since it only smooths over specific rough spots and can’t handle the broader issues that CMP resolves. For high-precision and large-scale applications, CMP is the way to go because it ensures a smooth, even surface throughout the wafer.
Please login or Register to submit your answer